Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why Computer are not Grandmasters in strength.

Author: Tapio Huuhka

Date: 11:04:20 06/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 2001 at 16:31:49, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>
>I'm simply saying that I know enough to recognize (a) a good C programmer from
>(b) an outstanding C programmer.  (a) might be all a business needs.  But I can
>tell them apart after 5 minutes of talking.  You only have to look at a few
>human vs GM games.  The kramnik match will be interesting to see how my feeling
>holds up.  Kramnik is only 100 points "better" than what many think the programs
>are now doing.  Let's see how the final score goes.  if it is "close" I will
>probably change my mind.  If it is "ugly" I won't.
>

Thanks for your posts, Bob, very informative I think. The match will surely be
very interesting and the chances are your feeling will hold up well enough. I'm
just thinking about Kramnik's performance against Fritz and Junior last year,
and I'm glad we'll get more examples of Kramnik handling computers -- he may be
the ideal player for that.

Tapio



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.