Author: James T. Walker
Date: 14:40:07 06/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2001 at 16:05:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 13, 2001 at 15:59:04, Peter Ackermann wrote: > >>If I compare the March-01-edition and the June-01-edition I see that not a >>single game was played with Hiarcs 7.32 for three month now. Both lists show >>Hiarcs 7.32 with 679 games. >>Is Hiarcs 7.32 not attractive anymore? I myself consider Hiarcs 7.32. still one >>of the very interesting engines and if I try engine-matches between the Tigers >>ans Hiarcs it is not so a clear result..... I have the impression that Gambit >>Tiger has some problems with the style of Hiarcs 7.32. So please give Hiarcs >>7.32 a chance from time to time even if Hiarcs 8 seems to be on the way. >> >>Peter > >What is your hardware and what is the time control of your game? > >It is important because Hiarcs7.32 does not like the K6-450 of the ssdf and I >also believe that it prefers also fast time control and not 2 hours/40 moves. > >Uri Hello Uri, I have seen post by you before like this and I don't agree. I would like to know where you get your information. I'm still running Hiarcs 7.32 on my Athlon 900 mhz machines and it still does very well against other top programs. For instance in my "standard" database (G/60 or longer) Hiarcs 7.32 is right now ranked tied for 6 place with Chess Tiger 13.0. It is behind Gambit Tiger 14.0,Chess Tiger 13.0, Deep Shredder and Fritz 6e/6b. This puts it ahead of programs like Gambit Tiger 1.0, Shredder 5, CM8K(32M), Junior 6.0 and Rebel Century 3.0. This is not a huge database. It has only 694 games but so far I see nothing to indicate Hiarcs does not compete with the faster hardware/longer time controls. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.