Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:37:08 06/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2001 at 15:35:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 14, 2001 at 14:59:05, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>...these games had been taken into account 3 days ago? >> >> >> >> Christophe > >I assume for this post that the ssdf do not update the rating game after every >match or every game but use all the games as one big tournament. > >It could give tiger14 not more than 4-5 elo increase. > >The expected result in 8 games based on the rating of the program is between >5-3 and 5.5-2.5 for tiger > >beating chessmaster 7-1 means earning 3-4 half points. > >Every half point gives less than 4/3 elo increase because tiger played more than >300 games so tiger could earn at most between 4/3*3=4 and 4/3*4=51/3 points in >the ssdf rating list. > >It means that Tiger14 has still lower rating than Gambittiger2. > >Uri and for your question about the ranking of tiger14 it is not going to be changed by these games. Tiger14 is number 3 in the ssdf list when Gambittiger is number 2. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.