Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 22:46:09 06/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2001 at 15:37:08, Uri Blass wrote:
>On June 14, 2001 at 15:35:46, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On June 14, 2001 at 14:59:05, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>...these games had been taken into account 3 days ago?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>
>>I assume for this post that the ssdf do not update the rating game after every
>>match or every game but use all the games as one big tournament.
>>
>>It could give tiger14 not more than 4-5 elo increase.
>>
>>The expected result in 8 games based on the rating of the program is between
>>5-3 and 5.5-2.5 for tiger
>>
>>beating chessmaster 7-1 means earning 3-4 half points.
>>
>>Every half point gives less than 4/3 elo increase because tiger played more than
>>300 games so tiger could earn at most between 4/3*3=4 and 4/3*4=51/3 points in
>>the ssdf rating list.
>>
>>It means that Tiger14 has still lower rating than Gambittiger2.
>>
>>Uri
>
>and for your question about the ranking of tiger14 it is not going to be changed
>by these games.
>
>Tiger14 is number 3 in the ssdf list when Gambittiger is number 2.
>
>Uri
OK, thanks for the info.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.