Author: Frank Phillips
Date: 02:57:30 06/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2001 at 20:00:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 14, 2001 at 18:03:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 14, 2001 at 13:49:43, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >> >> >>He played reasonably yesterday. First game today is to suffer thru a >>Sicilian where white plays g4 early. Why play into something like that with >>a machine? > >Maybe he simply knows the relevant line and knew from experience that he can get >an equal endgame against computers from the relevant line. > >He got a rook endgame against the machine in game 3 > >[D]5k2/5ppp/4p3/p5P1/2r1P2P/P4P2/4R1K1/8 w - - 0 1 > >The rook endgame seems to be equal. > >The GM in the previous day won Deep Junior in an equal pawn endgame so I do not >see something illogical in trading to a rook endgame and hoping to beat the >machine in the endgame if it does a mistake. > > > >> Ditto for game 4. Amazing strategy. :) > >I do not understand exactly which move do you criticize in game 4. > >Which move is leading to a tactical game instead of a positional game? > >Uri Proposed Definition of tactics: can calculate win, loss or draw. Definition of strategy: cannot. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.