Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 05:54:04 06/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2001 at 04:49:40, A.L.Mourik wrote: >On June 14, 2001 at 19:01:15, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>The Web has finally reached a point at this very moment where the votes are dead >>even 50% for 36......Bc6! and 50% for 36......Ng7!. This is the time where we >>need a good chess player if available at the CCC to analyze this critical >>position. But either way the web chose, Gambit Tiger II will get a draw and the >>extra pawn is worthless. Please correct my judgement if I am wrong in predicting >>the outcome as a draw. >> >>PS: Do we have a player higher than 2500 available at the CCC who can provide >>his analysis of this position for us. Please do not use your programs to submit >>your analysis since I have the ten best programs for which I can use at any time >>to analyze this position if I want to. >> >>http://www.rebel.nl/gt2-web.htm >> >>Pichard. > >I don't agree I still see possibilities after Ng7. I think not... Ng7 allows the White Bishop to capture at d5 and it has control of the nasty diagonal at f7. It allows White 2 bishops, at least one of them come to live, and the d4 pawn becomes a passed pawn and mobile, which in turn can allow the dark square Bishop come to live also. Restriction and trade down to a safe endgame is the best policy, thus I believe that Bc6 is better than Ng7. Regards, Laurence
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.