Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:44:45 06/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2001 at 14:29:28, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 15, 2001 at 08:35:35, Paul Petersson wrote: > >>On June 15, 2001 at 08:02:47, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2001 at 06:26:54, Paul Petersson wrote: >>> >>>>On June 14, 2001 at 14:59:05, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>...these games had been taken into account 3 days ago? >>>>> >>>> >>>>A more interesting question is what the ranking of CT14 would be if we had >>>>tested it in the CP GUI like GT2! I'm pretty sure it would have done better than >>>>the CB version. >>> >>>Why? >>> >>>It should do the same because the engine is the important thing and the GUI is >>>totally unimportant. >>> >> >>I'm not sure about that. I've seen several unexplainable losses/draws by >>CT14/CB. Sometimes things go bad when it can't access all the 5-man TBs. >> >>Paul >> >> >>>Uri > > > >Do you mean that in some of the SSDF matches Tiger did not have the FULL set of >5 men tablebases? > > > > Christophe I guess that no program had the full set 5 piece tablebases on the ssdf games. They probably had a big part of the tablebases but not all of them and I guess that they had the KPP vs KR but not the KQP vs KR. The KPP vs KR is more interesting for customers because the result of KQP vs KR is usually a win for the stronger side and endgames when the result is not clear are the interesting endgames. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.