Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 02:27:15 06/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2001 at 22:23:38, Mark Young wrote: >Nothing more really needs to be said, but you guys can debate more among >yourselves. To restate no ratings system is absolute the rating numbers be it >2500 or 3000 mean nothing in themselves. What is important is the difference >between two ratings in the same ratings pool. I agree. Do you agree with me that hence it is a bad idea to define 'GM strength' by ELO rating? That was what the discussion was about when you dropped in. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.