Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Stonewall vs chess programs

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:13:17 04/25/98

Go up one level in this thread


On April 25, 1998 at 05:15:59, Baldomero Garcia, Jr. wrote:

>Here is another Stonewall game, this time against Crafty.  Bob made the
>comment in RGCC that Crafty's code had been changed to recognize the
>pawn
>structure.  I don't know for sure if the early exchange of pawns made
>Crafty not realize what it was getting into.  Unfortunately it's not the
>latest and greatest Crafty, and it's not running in the fastest hardware
>either.
>
>[Event "Private Match"]
>[Site "Yokosuka, Japan"]
>[Date "1998.04.25"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Garcia, Baldomero"]
>[WhiteElo "1997 USCF"]
>[Black "Crafty 14.6 Mac Performa 6320"]
>[BlackElo "2205 LCT2"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>

Basically, your explanation is correct.  14K nodes per second when I'm
now used to seeing 300K is very slow...  slow enough that Crafty on my
machine playing 10 seconds per move would out-search crafty on your mac.

Also, this version appears to be one that was "right in the middle" of
some changes to the Stonewall code...  Perhaps 15.4 will be compiled for
the Mac soon, and you can try it again...  but remember, Crafty is a
"null-mover" which means slow computers are really incompatible with it,
since it was "designed" on a P6/200.  If you slow it down by a factor
of 10, you can expect null-move problems, and in the Stonewall, there is
*plenty* of opportunity for them...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.