Author: Mark Young
Date: 06:58:42 06/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2001 at 05:27:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 15, 2001 at 22:23:38, Mark Young wrote: > >>Nothing more really needs to be said, but you guys can debate more among >>yourselves. To restate no ratings system is absolute the rating numbers be it >>2500 or 3000 mean nothing in themselves. What is important is the difference >>between two ratings in the same ratings pool. > >I agree. > >Do you agree with me that hence it is a bad idea to define 'GM strength' >by ELO rating? > >That was what the discussion was about when you dropped in. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.