Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Women and computerchess

Author: Don Dailey

Date: 10:25:57 04/25/98

Go up one level in this thread


On April 25, 1998 at 11:17:47, mick adams wrote:

>It seems to me fairly academic, that if, Judit Polgar were to play Bobby
>Fischer in Reykjavic,right now,the outcome,would,indubitally(or without
>doubt)favour the male of the species,and why is this?Surely not because
>Judit is a female!No perhaps it is because,in Reykjavic the environement
>conspires against the human race,no right-minded turnip,would surely
>know the difference.Judit is fantastic! i love her,but you know so is
>Bobby,and he's all grown up,and i don't think he was designed upon to
>the same extent as sister POLGAR.If,Judit becomes peregnant,her cute
>play agin masters of the ilk of Korchnoi,will be seen in true
>light.micky.

I beg to differ, but it seems highly unlikely that the current Bobby
Fischer could win a match against Judit Polgar.  I haven't been
following
this thread so I hope my comment is not out of context somehow.

But since I'm here, I might as well throw my 2 cents in and hope these
comments are not out of context.    I believe it is likely (after
sorting
out millions of environmental factors) that men and women are not
exactly
the same intellectually.  Based on Judit's performance the evidence is
on the side of female superiority at chess.  I'm basing this on the fact
that percentage-wise, VERY FEW women persue chess compared to men.  This
of course is not a strong case because there are many arguments that
could
be offered as to why this is so.   But I've always prefered hard
evidence
over lot's of speculation which I've learned over the years is quite
unreliable.

My gut intuition (which I rarely trust) is that neither sex has a basic
inherited advantage (on the average) over the other.  I strongly suspect
both sexes bring (again this is a broad generalization that only applies
to the average, not individual case) their own strengths and weaknesses
to the game.

But surely if there turned out to be a sex advantage in chess for one
side
over the other it must be so small as to be practically immeasurable.

But isn't it best just to judge each person on his own merit?  After
all,
who of us in this newsgroup has any chance whatsoever against Judit
Polgar?

- Don



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.