Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 12:12:38 06/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2001 at 11:01:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 16, 2001 at 09:58:42, Mark Young wrote: > >>On June 16, 2001 at 05:27:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2001 at 22:23:38, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Nothing more really needs to be said, but you guys can debate more among >>>>yourselves. To restate no ratings system is absolute the rating numbers be it >>>>2500 or 3000 mean nothing in themselves. What is important is the difference >>>>between two ratings in the same ratings pool. >>> >>>I agree. >>> >>>Do you agree with me that hence it is a bad idea to define 'GM strength' >>>by ELO rating? >>> >>>That was what the discussion was about when you dropped in. > >Yes. And note that it is a human title in a human field of players, >hence no rating pool distributions. I meant disturbance, of course. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.