Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Result based standards Vs. Subjective standard for computer GM status.

Author: Bill Gletsos

Date: 22:14:18 06/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 16, 2001 at 17:27:02, Chris Carson wrote:

>My opinion is very simple, but many will disagree (that's, ok, I can live with
>that).  :)
>
>Have an organization provide Human vs Computer tournaments to rate programs
>using the same criteria as FIDE.  Give it a separate name so that human GM's are
>separated.  Make money at it and provide money for the GM's.  Separate titles,
>same criteria.
>
>For me as a consumer, the title is not important, the performance is.  For me as
>a programmer, same thing.  :)
>
>Thats it.  :)
>
>Best Regards,
>Chris Carson

Chris you are right. It makes sense to use the same criteria as FIDE. Using any
other criteria would simply mean that people could argue that a computer GM
title wasnt worth the same as a human GM because the criteria was different.

Best Regards,
Bill



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.