Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:31:59 06/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2001 at 03:58:00, pete stein wrote: >On June 16, 2001 at 13:44:36, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On June 16, 2001 at 11:12:06, pete stein wrote: >> >>>On June 16, 2001 at 09:39:56, Albert Silver wrote: >>> >>>>On June 16, 2001 at 04:45:45, pete stein wrote: >>>> >>>>>To blow White out of Metanalyzed.ctg one needs to pull not just a few but a >>>>>whole series of boners(!), that throw away the game. >>>>>The shortest line I was able to find so far to escape Metanalyzed.ctg is: >>>>>1.d4 c5(!) 2.dxc5 d5(!) 3.cxd6 e6(!) >>>> >>>>Why not try some Modern Defense type of setup? 1.d4 g6 2.c4 a6 for example. >>>>It'll probably play 3.e4 then you just develop normally. You don't need to throw >>>>away material to get a program out of book. >>>> >>>> Albert >>>> >>>> >>>>>I haven't found a shorter series of boners to blow White out of book. >>>>>Does Black still have a chance of a draw ? >>>>> >>>>>Pete >>> >>>Your line with all derivatives is still in book >> >>With ALL derivatives? You mean that after 1.d4 g6 2.c4 a6 it has all 30 possible >>moves for White in the book? What does it play? and after White's 3rd move to >>these two move, it also has every possible Black move in the book? >> >> Albert >> >> >>> and no I don't have a site and >>>no it is not available (yet) >>> >>>Pete > >It's not astonishing since I included Deep Force in Metanalysis. What is the meaning of all derivatives. I guess that you mean that it has one book book move after 1.d4 g6 2.c4 a6 for example 3.e4 and after every move of black it has a reply for white Am I correct? I guess that the book was based on previous analysis of the program Am I correct? How many positions did the program analyze and how much time did your program analyze in order to create the book? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.