Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Optimal Gambit Tiger 2 settings for Man-Machine slow match TIME SENSITIV

Author: Edward Seid

Date: 06:22:34 06/17/01


(cross-posted on Rebel board)

BACKGROUND

I'm the operator of HiddenDragon(C) on USCL, which is Gambit Tiger 2.0.  I've
read with interest a recent thread on CCC concerning the proper standard to use
in determining the strength of a computer chess program.  One side states that
an assessment of a program's strength should be based on its results against
strong human opposition.  The other side argues that since there is little
existing data on man-machine slow matches, that a reliable conclusion cannot be
made.

PURPOSE

As operator of HiddenDragon(C), I aim to collect game data and results of the
Gambit Tiger 2.0 engine against FIDE-titled opposition using a slow time control
for the purpose of accurately determining the true strength of Gambit Tiger 2.0
against humans under tournament-like conditions.

METHOD

I propose a series of mini-matches to be held against selected FIDE-titled human
opponents on USCL.
The first of these matches is scheduled to begin Thursday, June 21st against
FilthyAnimal(FM).  The time control will be 90 minutes + 60 second increment.
(Note that this is slower than the the current FIDE control of 75 minutes / 40
moves + 15 minutes for the rest of the game)  Currently, two games/week are
planned.  The first competitor to WIN 6 games will be declared the winnner.

TOOLS

The hardware used will be an AMD Athlon 1GHz processor, 768 MB RAM, Windows 2000
Pro.  The program will be Gambit Tiger 2.0.  All 3/4/5-piece tablebases will be
used.

SEEKING ADVICE

I wish to optimize the settings for Gambit Tiger 2.0 and seek your advice.

The currently proposed settings are:
Permanent brain ON
Transposition tables ON
Use endgame databases ON
Ignore 50 moves rule OFF
Hashtable 192 MB
Draw score -15
Anti-human play ON
Engine priority NORMAL
Style NORMAL
Endgame cache size 16 MB
Endgame depth 4

GUI books OFF
Engine books ON
will use gambit.tbk (renamed to ct.tbk)

I appreciate all comments and suggestions.  If you disagree with the above
settings, please provide an explanation along with suggestions.

I realize that this experiment is imperfect.  In any case, I hope to add to the
information available regarding man-machine matches.

Ed Seid
Operator of HiddenDragon(C) on USCL



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.