Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Think 2500 is too low a standard to be GM status for computers?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 11:33:08 06/17/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 17, 2001 at 14:20:17, Mark Young wrote:

>For those who think the 2500+ standard is too low a standard, here is the list
>of grandamsters in the top 1000 below 2500 elo. As you see there are many below
>2500 elo. The 2500+ elo standard is a good benchmark to be considered GM
>strength status for computers.
>
>
>Rank, Name,         Title,   Rating.
>611 Van Der Wiel, John T.H.  g NED 2493 09.08.59 M

How ironic he has to be in there :-)

(I remember Rebel's result, but I also remember Fritz's result)

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.