Author: A.L.Mourik
Date: 13:26:14 06/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2001 at 15:13:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On June 18, 2001 at 10:50:32, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>My Reply to Bram Mourik, Rebel Forum >> >>To see all lines please go to the Rebel Forum. >> >> >> >>Good Work Bram! I haven't had time to study _all_ your side lines, but I looked >>more deeply into you _Mainline_ and found an important variation, which again >>appears to draw! *Sigh* >>I will post _only_ the new variation from your _mainline_, so as to keep it >>clear. >> >>37.Bxd5 Nf5 38.Kf2 Kg7 39.Kf3 Nd6 40.Na2 f6 41.Ke2 Bb5+ 42.Kd1 Nf5 43.Bxb3 Nxe3+ >>44.Kc1 Nf5 45.d5 Nd4 46.Bd1 Be2 47.Nc3 Bc4 48.h4 fxg5 49.fxg5 Kf7 50.Kb1 Ke7 >>51.Ka1 Nf5 52.h5 -0.69/16 3 gxh5 -0.72/13 3 53.Bxh5 -0.69/12 2 Nd4 -0.69/17 2:27 >>54.g6 -0.75/13 4 Nc2+ -0.69/12 1 55.Kb1 -0.87/14 4 hxg6 -0.69/13 5 56.Bxg6 >>-0.66/12 1 Line >> >>I used Fritz6 as an aid, but again it isn't >>clear that we the Web have a certain win. >> >>52.h5! by White seems to hold Tigers' Game. >> >>Nonetheless, I'm impressed with this level of analysis!! >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>Please check this refutation, at the Rebel Forum. Thanks! >> >>Regards, >> Terry >> >> >>P.S. I believe at the moment the web has a draw with an advantage for Black. >> But it's unlikely we have a forced win. Too many resources for White. >> >> Although, White made an error on move 28 with 28.exd5? and a small error >> again with 31.Ne4?!, so it's certainly possible that GT 2.0 may make >> slip. If Tiger makes another inaccurate move, then the Web will most likey >> have a win. I think this endgame may be too hard for GT 2.0 to handle well, >> thus the chance to win is relatively good. (It's tough for _all_ programs) >> If the web keeps up it's high level of play I think within the next few >> moves we will see GT 2.0 probably start to misplay the position thus >> making it possible for the Web to win. >> The next 10 moves will be critical for White, so patience should yield >> dividends for us The Web. > > >Terry at depth 21 it is very hard to see the draw, but not everybody has a >machine with the capability of reaching depth 24 and beyond if possible like Ed >Panek. > >Pichard. Dear Pichard, you presume it is only a few plies more search depth to show us that you are right ?? I think it is more modest to show your own homecooking in the Rebel forum before to make such statements.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.