Author: Mark Young
Date: 00:49:07 06/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2001 at 00:31:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 18, 2001 at 18:01:49, Chris Carson wrote: > >>Nice summary Mark. Calculate the overall average for GM's, I did it last year >>and it was around 2525. Programs are performaing higher than that and >>performance is the only thing that matters in my opinion. :) >> >>I for one do not care about a title, but the performance is the key. :) >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson > > >Several points: > >1. anyone check the _age_ of each GM being 'averaged' into this mess? IE >a 75 year old GM is still a GM, but won't have much of a rating. > >2. anyhone check to make sure ratings were current? IE Fischer's rating is >not particularly interesting since it is 30 years old and from a different >rating era. > >The main problem is probably age. Just like the "baby-boomers" are threatening >retirement systems around the world, they are also moving up into the "older-GM" >group as well. If you have more old GM players, then you will have a lower >overall GM average. Which means exactly nothing of course. This is data from the latest Fide list. If you think the data is flawed....Old Grandmasters, Out of date Grandmasters, mistakes in calculations, or just fraud etc. Then make your case with data not theory. It's easy to bluster, it much harder to do the work to prove the case as I and others are doing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.