Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 02:43:00 06/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2001 at 21:07:19, Slater Wold wrote: >These tests were run on a Dual Pentium III 1,000mhz, 1028MB RAM. > >Doesn't seem like the MMX optimizations do anything. This was a tad >surprising. They require a good superscalar MMX unit on the cpu to give an advantage. The one on the Athlons flies on that code. I don't know how the PIII does, but it wouldn't be a suprise if the Athlon turns out to be more efficient. BTW. Your comparisation is horribly broken. If you bench you should get the EXACT SAME nodecount for all versions. If they are searching different trees, something is broken somewhere and there is little sense in comparing the produced nps. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.