Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 07:42:20 06/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Mark! Your arguments look pretty convincing. But be prepared to more objections (they are not my objections but I am sure they will eventually arise): -What is important is the rating of the player at the time she/he gets the grandmaster title. Averaging this may require a phenomenal amount of work, as you have to find some old ratings over a huge time period. Your opponents may hope that you do not have the time and energy to collect this data. -The computers have not played enough games. For some programs this is true, but the most active against humans should have enough or almost enough games to meet the FIDE requirements for humans (and when a human gets the GM title nobody complains about statistical uncertainty due to the small number of games played). José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.