Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:20:36 06/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2001 at 12:08:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 19, 2001 at 12:05:33, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>The Deep Blue clone FriarTuck > >I feel like the last few days of refuting Vincent's post here >have been void. > >FriarTuck is crafty with singular extensions. Not Deep Blue. >It runs 500Knps, not 200Mnps but my modifications have made crafty nearly as inefficient as deep blue was searching. I'm not saying crafty is tactical as strong at the same depth as DB was. What i'm saying is that the overhead it requires to get near a depth n is more near the overhead of what DB needed to get to a depth n, because nowadays very few who post here can still imagine how bad those days were when one didn't have nullmove and no shared hashtables. Best regards, Vincent >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.