Author: odell hall
Date: 03:14:41 06/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2001 at 05:19:01, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >Hi Odell, >What do you exactly mean for understanding ? >Do you mean the evaluation function of the program ? >In the final count I think that is the performance that counts as many others >pointed out. Well I just mean the knowledge that the programmers incorparate into their programs, such as, knowledge of bishops of opposite colours, strategy, pawn structure, ofcourse they really have no "real' understanding at all, but they have enough artificial knowledge to allow them to play chess strategically at the 2100 level, but that does not mean they can not perform at the grandmaster level. as i pointed out earlier they have special talent's that humans lack, they don't get tired, they don't get intimadated, they calculate accurately, ect, ect, this is what makes them perform at the grandmaster level, but as far as their understanding of Chess, they are in no way grandmasters, i think everyone can agree with this. But if we speak of Results, i think they are grandmaster, as deep jr, did perform at the 2600 level performance rating Dr. hyatt and fide requires, along ofcourse with Fritz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.