Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:41:50 06/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2001 at 08:42:03, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On June 19, 2001 at 18:40:45, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On June 19, 2001 at 13:32:54, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On June 19, 2001 at 13:27:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>Deep Blue had 4000 tunable parameters in the eval. >>>>How many does the "Deep Blue Clone" have? >>>> >>>>This isn't even an apples to oranges comparison. It's apples to orangutans. >>> >>>It's amazing. There are actually people that have come >>>to FICS and asked me whether FriarTuck was running on >>>DB chess chips or whether it was a software implementation. >>> >>>ITS CRAFTY FOR CHRYSTS SAKE! >>> >>>It's not Deep Blue. It doesnt even do SE the same way DB did. >>> >>>It's got NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH DEEP BLUE. >> >>Still, I see a paralell. It uses SE. Come on, let's be honest, it is practically >>Deep Blue! > >Ferret is also using SE, as Bruce told us. So, we have aleady 2 Deep Blue >Clones. >May be, there is a real lot of them. > >Yes, the world is full of clones and clowns. > >Uli >> >>Bas. Yep. Dave Kittinger also used them in recent versions of Wchess. Lang used them starting in genius 2 I believe. Vincent always said "SE sucks" but he now claims to be using them as well. Before long it will be possible to use one of several programs to make a "DB Clone" if you believe in such nonsense. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.