Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 23:43:51 06/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2001 at 23:45:21, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 21, 2001 at 17:15:59, Sune Larsson wrote: > >> >> [D]4k2r/rp5p/pR4p1/4qp2/3pp1PQ/8/2P4P/R5K1 w k - 0 28 >> >> >> This position is from IM Berg-GM Hector, Sigeman tournament - Malmo. >> These two very tactical skilled Swedes had battled it out just like >> old masters did in the 19th century. Young Emanuel Berg sacked one >> pawn after another but, as it looked, in vain. Now, all good stories >> give some glory to the brave one and that is also what happened here. >> In the above position white, 4 pawns less, has the resource 28.Ra5!! - >> with the point 28.-Qxa5 29.Qf6! (not 29.Re6+ Kd7). At the present >> moment it looks like this 28.Ra5!! is good enough to draw the game >> for white. >> >> >> Test 1: Can your program find the move 28.Ra5!! - evals? > >It's a terrible [definitely losing] blunder, throwing away the rook for no >compensation: > Why do you post such crap here and in other threads??? Please try thinking first before writing. 28.Ra5 is a good move. Have a look at the position first. It's not enough to give the position to a program, have a look at the score and than writing "It's a terrible [definitely losing] blunder," Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.