Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 07:13:45 06/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2001 at 09:10:06, Dan Andersson wrote: >Gambit Tiger 2.0 in fact sees the whole continuation (almost), excluding the >less good defence from black. As a sidenote: GM Larry M Christiansen was less >than impressive when unofficially analyzing the game. After 15... Rb8 he thought >that 16. a3 was necessary due to Rb4, when in fact 16. Re3 w with the idea Rf3! >is totally winning in at least two different ways. Really stunning! This game shows some vulnerability of very high ranked super-GM:s, when it comes down to old and rare lines. All preparation gone. Compare with Capablanca's instinct of playing Rb8 before h6. Sune > >Regards Dan Andersson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.