Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 12:21:23 06/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2001 at 15:05:32, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>On June 22, 2001 at 13:30:41, Ingo Bauer wrote:
>
>>On June 22, 2001 at 10:31:35, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>Many peaple sayed why I played only blitzgames 5'-30' on my old P600!?
>>>
>>>I played today "now" a game against Deep Shredder on Level
>>>120'/40+60'/20+60'20...and I wins!
>>>Is this game now Ok?
>>>Question: Played Deep Shredder like a grandmaster? I think, no !
>>>Time for this game was about 5 hours. Every day this ? ;-)
>>>
>>>P600, 128MB hash, 4+5 pieces cache 16 MB:
>>>
>>>
>>>position after move one:
>>>
>>>[D]rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/P7/8/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
>>>
>>>game:
>>>
>>>[Event "120'/40+60'/20+60'/20, Stuttgart"]
>>>[Site "Stuttgart"]
>>>[Date "2001.06.22"]
>>>[Round ""]
>>>[White "Nemeth,E"]
>>>[Black "Deep Shredder"]
>>>[ECO "A00"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>
>>>1. a4 {0s} e5 {Buch 0s} 2. e4 {8s (c3)} Nf6 {+0.29/14
>>>3:57m} 3. Nc3 {13s} Bb4 {+0.38/14 4:43m} 4. d3 {50s (Sf3)}
>>>d5 {+0.53/14 5:14m} 5. Bd2 {8s (exd5)} O-O {+0.49/13 7:19m}
>>>6. Nge2 {4s (Sf3)} d4 {+0.80/12 4:08m} 7. Nb1 {10s (Sb5)}
>>>Qd6 {+0.75/12 3:37m} 8. b3 {5s (Sa3)} Bg4 {+0.95/12 4:43m}
>>>9. h3 {16s} Bd7 {+0.83/12 2:49m} 10. Ng3 {4s} Nc6 {+0.67/13
>>>6:31m} 11. Be2 {4s} Qc5 {+0.88/12 2:43m} 12. O-O {3s} Bxd2
>>>{+0.73/11 2:44m} 13. Qxd2 {42s} Ne8 {+0.76/12 2:12m}
>>>14. Na3 {11s (c3)} Nd6 {+0.79/11 25s} 15. Bg4 {21s (Dd1)}
>>>Bxg4 {+0.90/10 15s} 16. hxg4 {2s} f6 {+0.56/13 3:55m}
>>>17. Nf5 {1:16m (g5)} a6 {+0.76/12 3:42m} 18. Kh2 {25s (f4)}
>>>Nf7 {+0.94/13 4:37m} 19. Kg1 {1:03m} Ng5 {+0.97/12 1:47m}
>>>20. Kh2 {44s (Tfb1)} Ne6 {+1.11/13 4:50m} 21. Rfb1 {58s
>>>(Kg1)} Nb4 {+1.06/13 2:49m} 22. Rc1 {7s} Rfd8 {+1.05/13
>>>3:05m} 23. g3 {48s (Kg1)} Rab8 {+1.07/12 3:05m} 24. Kg2
>>>{6:40m (f4)} Nc6 {+0.99/12 4:14m} 25. Nc4 {4:10m} Rf8
>>>{+0.98/13 0s} 26. Nb2 {3:25m (f3)} Rfe8 {+0.97/12 3:30m}
>>>27. Rh1 {18s (Sc4)} Red8 {+1.01/12 2:26m} 28. Rhc1 {3:08m}
>>>Rbc8 {+0.97/12 1:10m} 29. Rh1 {18s (Sc4)} Re8 {+0.99/12
>>>3:54m} 30. Rhc1 {1:40m} Rcd8 {+0.97/12 31s} 31. Rh1 {9s
>>>(Sc4)} b6 {+0.99/12 3:41m} 32. Rhc1 {16s} Rb8 {+0.97/12
>>>4:01m} 33. Rh1 {1:18m (Sc4)} Red8 {+0.97/12 2:28m} 34. Rhc1
>>>{19s} Ra8 {+0.95/11 57s} 35. Rh1 {2:16m (Sc4)} b5 {+1.01/11
>>>1:34m} 36. Rhc1 {1:28m (f3)} Nb4 {+0.89/11 3:58m} 37. Kh2
>>>{29s (f4)} Qf8 {+1.05/11 1:09m} 38. Kg2 {16s (f4)} c5
>>>{+1.02/12 1:23m} 39. Rh1 {13s (f3)} Qe8 {+0.98/11 3:35m}
>>>40. f3 {21s (Th2)} Ng5 {+0.87/10 34s} 41. Kf2 {29s} Nc6
>>>{+0.76/11 2:30m} 42. Rh2 {7s} Qd7 {+0.68/12 3:49m} 43. Rah1
>>>{9s} h6 {+0.62/12 2:53m} 44. f4 {2:04m (Ke2)} Ne6 {+0.92/11
>>>1:12m} 45. Ke2 {1:01m} Rab8 {+0.81/11 4:24m} 46. Nxh6+
>>>{2:58m (Kd1)} gxh6 {+0.52/11 22s} 47. Rxh6 {5s} Ng7
>>>{+0.33/11 9:36m} 48. g5 {52s} c4 {+0.02/11 7:11m} 49. bxc4
>>>{42s} Qg4+ {-0.88/9 2:39m} 50. Kf2 {6s} fxg5 {-0.29/12
>>>6:29m} 51. f5 {6s} Rf8 {-0.87/12 3:03m} 52. Qe2 {1:04m}
>>>Qxe2+ {-0.96/12 0s} 53. Kxe2 {1s} Rfc8 {-1.02/14 2:55m}
>>>54. axb5 {18s} axb5 {-1.29/14 1:20m} 55. cxb5 {3s} Na5
>>>{-1.32/14 1:25m} 56. Nc4 {14s} Nxc4 {-1.41/15 2:01m}
>>>57. dxc4 {3s} Kf7 {-1.30/14 1:36m} 58. Ra1 {16s} Rb7
>>>{-1.75/13 1:12m} 59. Kd3 {9s} g4 {-2.10/13 1:48m} 60. b6
>>>{17s} Ne8 {-2.59/14 1:17m} 61. Rh7+ {29s} Ng7 {-2.48/15 0s}
>>>62. Ra5 {1:00m} Rc6 {-3.27/16 6:08m} 63. c5 {2s} Rc8
>>>{-3.13/15 3:38m} 64. Rb5 {6s (Kc4)} Rbb8 {-3.48/16 4:30m}
>>>65. Kc4 {29s} Kg8 {-3.96/16 6:46m} 66. Rh6 {18s} Ne8
>>>{-4.60/16 8:11m} 67. c6 {16s} Rb7 {-4.81/15 5:10m} 68. Kc5
>>>{15s} Kg7 {-5.23/15 6:09m} 69. Re6 {4s} Kf8 {-6.04/15
>>>5:15m} 70. Rxe5 {6s} 1-0
>>>
>>>Endposition after 5 hours:
>>>
>>>[D]2r1nk2/1r6/1PP5/1RK1RP2/3pP1p1/6P1/2P5/8 b - -
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Eduard
>>
>>Hi Eduard
>>
>>Nice Game as allways. Just a short Question. Do you play these games with a look
>>at the evaluation of the Computer? (It doesnt matter if this is played against
>>DS, F6 or any other Programm)
>>
>>Ingo
>
>Hi Ingo!
>
>Sorry my english is bad. I say in german:
>
>Schaue dir die ersten 40 Züge genan an Ingo. Kein Computer der Welt
>würde so spielen, obn ich PC-Varianten dabei sehe oder nicht!
>Doofer gehts wirklich kaum noch was DS in diesen Zügen produziert
>hat - Hand aufs Herz, stimmt's?
>
>Den Rest konnte ich dann anders "garnicht" spielen! DS hätte
>am damenflügel ab Zug 48 gestürmt, also kam ich am Königsflügel
>zuvor.
>
>(Du weisst doch dass ich englich nur schlecht spreche, oder?
>Im GS-Forum kannst Du mich auf deutsch besser fragen, weil ich
>dort besser antworten kann wie hier)
>
>Ok.?
>
>Eduard
Hi, again!
Ich meine "MEINE" ersten 40 Züge würde kein Programm der Welt so
spielen.
My first 40 moves played a Computer not! It was human Anticompuermoves,
or not?
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.