Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 17:09:00 06/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2001 at 19:48:40, Slater Wold wrote: >On June 22, 2001 at 19:08:22, Scott Gasch wrote: > >>On June 22, 2001 at 17:57:21, Chris Duggan wrote: >> >>>From his finger-notes... can anyone fill in the details?! >>> >>>Information about JRLOK(GM) (Last disconnected Fri Jun 22 2001 15:23): >>> >>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>Loser's 1897 [6] 0 2 0 2 >>>Bullet 2450 605 467 81 1153 2839 (23-Oct-2000) >>>Blitz 3451 293 491 430 1214 3451 (20-Jun-2001) >>>Standard 2643 14 5 7 26 2656 (13-Jun-2001) >>> >>> 1: I knew that admins will find a way to dicredit my rating. I understand it >>>was bothering them a lot. I know they hated seeing me having high rating >>> 2: they invented new rule!!! And.............they aplied it retroactively. They >>>desrve the compliments for creativity!!! Although fact of them hating me helped >>>a lot!!! >>> 3: I really feel the misery they went through and feel sorry for them >>> 4: I am sure admins will read this note.....I have some good and some bad news >>>for you.. >>> 5: good news for admins , that I will never play on your server when you guys >>>don't have a clue what you are doing, and the news..is that I will make public >>>discussion matter. >>> 6: Admins did great job discouraging me from playing on this server >>> 7: new rule I was talking about was that you must play equal # of games against >>>humans and computers. They put it in help records file and took record away from >>>me >>> 8: I know exactly why it was done , but than they got some unpleasant responds >>>and had to change it back.. Poor admins >> >> >>BTW, everyone arguing that comps are GM strength... I suspect this goes against >>your argument. I don't know the details at all here but I surmise JRLOK was >>beating some high rated computers frequently and that is how he got a rating >>near 3500 on ICC. I heard he was playing scrappy alot, among others. >> >>I think this is proof of what a human GM can do when they put their mind to >>doing something... The human mind is still the best chess computer, in my >>opinion. >> >>Scott > >LMAO - NO. NOT AT ALL. > >He played "scrappy" a _LOT_ ~ And lost most of them. Actually, just over 75% of >them. However they were blitz games, mostly 5/7. > > >Slate 75% is rather misleading. He is over 50% over the last 30 or so games.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.