Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:40:54 06/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2001 at 20:09:00, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On June 22, 2001 at 19:48:40, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On June 22, 2001 at 19:08:22, Scott Gasch wrote: >> >>>On June 22, 2001 at 17:57:21, Chris Duggan wrote: >>> >>>>From his finger-notes... can anyone fill in the details?! >>>> >>>>Information about JRLOK(GM) (Last disconnected Fri Jun 22 2001 15:23): >>>> >>>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>>Loser's 1897 [6] 0 2 0 2 >>>>Bullet 2450 605 467 81 1153 2839 (23-Oct-2000) >>>>Blitz 3451 293 491 430 1214 3451 (20-Jun-2001) >>>>Standard 2643 14 5 7 26 2656 (13-Jun-2001) >>>> >>>> 1: I knew that admins will find a way to dicredit my rating. I understand it >>>>was bothering them a lot. I know they hated seeing me having high rating >>>> 2: they invented new rule!!! And.............they aplied it retroactively. They >>>>desrve the compliments for creativity!!! Although fact of them hating me helped >>>>a lot!!! >>>> 3: I really feel the misery they went through and feel sorry for them >>>> 4: I am sure admins will read this note.....I have some good and some bad news >>>>for you.. >>>> 5: good news for admins , that I will never play on your server when you guys >>>>don't have a clue what you are doing, and the news..is that I will make public >>>>discussion matter. >>>> 6: Admins did great job discouraging me from playing on this server >>>> 7: new rule I was talking about was that you must play equal # of games against >>>>humans and computers. They put it in help records file and took record away from >>>>me >>>> 8: I know exactly why it was done , but than they got some unpleasant responds >>>>and had to change it back.. Poor admins >>> >>> >>>BTW, everyone arguing that comps are GM strength... I suspect this goes against >>>your argument. I don't know the details at all here but I surmise JRLOK was >>>beating some high rated computers frequently and that is how he got a rating >>>near 3500 on ICC. I heard he was playing scrappy alot, among others. >>> >>>I think this is proof of what a human GM can do when they put their mind to >>>doing something... The human mind is still the best chess computer, in my >>>opinion. >>> >>>Scott >> >>LMAO - NO. NOT AT ALL. >> >>He played "scrappy" a _LOT_ ~ And lost most of them. Actually, just over 75% of >>them. However they were blitz games, mostly 5/7. >> >> >>Slate > > >75% is rather misleading. He is over 50% over the last 30 or so games. The last 30 are misleading. He probably knows scrappy better than Bob does now. Repetition is the MASTER of teachers. He has over 1,000 games against scrappy. He knows it pretty well now. I bet when he started, he lost over 90% of his first 30 games against scrappy. I was speaking, "overall." Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.