Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 00:32:22 06/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2001 at 19:08:22, Scott Gasch wrote: >On June 22, 2001 at 17:57:21, Chris Duggan wrote: > >>From his finger-notes... can anyone fill in the details?! >> >>Information about JRLOK(GM) (Last disconnected Fri Jun 22 2001 15:23): >> >> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>Loser's 1897 [6] 0 2 0 2 >>Bullet 2450 605 467 81 1153 2839 (23-Oct-2000) >>Blitz 3451 293 491 430 1214 3451 (20-Jun-2001) >>Standard 2643 14 5 7 26 2656 (13-Jun-2001) >> >> 1: I knew that admins will find a way to dicredit my rating. I understand it >>was bothering them a lot. I know they hated seeing me having high rating >> 2: they invented new rule!!! And.............they aplied it retroactively. They >>desrve the compliments for creativity!!! Although fact of them hating me helped >>a lot!!! >> 3: I really feel the misery they went through and feel sorry for them >> 4: I am sure admins will read this note.....I have some good and some bad news >>for you.. >> 5: good news for admins , that I will never play on your server when you guys >>don't have a clue what you are doing, and the news..is that I will make public >>discussion matter. >> 6: Admins did great job discouraging me from playing on this server >> 7: new rule I was talking about was that you must play equal # of games against >>humans and computers. They put it in help records file and took record away from >>me >> 8: I know exactly why it was done , but than they got some unpleasant responds >>and had to change it back.. Poor admins > > Incredible!!, I can´t believe this. I dont understand why some people in ICC was trying to dicredit Roman rating... This is a really shame for the Admins. It is a pity, Many chess players that love to see the great Roman playing against computers and now he will not come to play anymore!. In what other place can i see Roman playing?? Somebody knows his e-mail? Please... Bob or any person??? Tanya Deborah. >BTW, everyone arguing that comps are GM strength... I suspect this goes against >your argument. I don't know the details at all here but I surmise JRLOK was >beating some high rated computers frequently and that is how he got a rating >near 3500 on ICC. I heard he was playing scrappy alot, among others. > >I think this is proof of what a human GM can do when they put their mind to >doing something... The human mind is still the best chess computer, in my >opinion. > >Scott
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.