Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:18:17 06/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2001 at 14:49:52, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: 30 against a linux 550Mhz machine with diep with a random book. Note diep extends more Singular Extensions as you do, apart from loads of other extensions, so it's *impossible* to claim you see tactical more as i see with induction more as Friartuck. However at a 550Mhz linux machine i guess several moves diep searches 7 ply at 30 0, as extensions eats some nodes. In 1997 i already figured out at the world champs and several touranments that you need at least 10+ ply to play reasonable chess. I initially even concluded 12 ply was needed, with the loads of extensions i do nowadays that's 10+ ply. Further 2 games is saying shit. But it's according to what i claimed. DIEP's tactical with induction stronger as crafty if i get 10+ ply, especially with the implementation as you did. rompt: fics% Interface: "xboard 4.2.3 + crafty" f1: !abuser & !private & nocolor f2: (rated & time <= 30 & inc <= 12) || (unrated & time <= 5 & inc <= 2) f3: blitz | lightning | standard f4: # f5: # lowest RD 9.7 99-6-19 Current FICS record ! Only games with humans. f6: # f7: # I prey upon those who ignore basic tactics. f8: # See my journal games for some free basic chess lessons. Formula: f1 & f2 & f3 fics% Please play some 120 60 games (about 3 minutes a move) or allow them to get played. You don't even allow them unrated now. Best regards, Vincent >[Event "ICS Rated standard match"] >[Site "freechess.org"] >[Date "2001.06.23"] >[Round "-"] >[White "FriarTuck"] >[Black "diep"] >[Result "*"] >[WhiteElo "2303"] >[BlackElo "2350"] >[TimeControl "1800"] > >1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 e5 8. >e4 c6 9. h3 Qb6 10. Re1 Re8 11. d5 Nc5 12. Rb1 cxd5 13. cxd5 Qb4 14. Nh4 >Bd7 15. Qf3 h5 16. Bd2 Rac8 17. Bf1 Qb6 18. b4 Na4 19. Nxa4 Bxa4 20. Be3 >Qc7 21. Rbc1 Qb8 22. Bg5 Nh7 23. Be3 Nf6 24. b5 Bc2 25. Bg5 Nh7 26. Bd2 Bf6 >27. Ng2 Bg5 28. Bxg5 Nxg5 29. Qe3 Nxh3+ 30. Kh2 Bxe4 31. Kxh3 Bxd5 32. Kh2 >Bxa2 33. Ra1 Be6 34. Rxa7 b6 35. Rea1 d5 36. Qg5 Qd6 37. Qf6 Rc7 38. Ra8 >Rcc8 39. Rxc8 Rxc8 40. Ra7 Qb8 41. Re7 Re8 42. Rxe8+ Qxe8 43. Qxe5 Qc8 44. >Nf4 Qc5 45. Kg2 Qe7 46. Qb8+ Kh7 47. Qxb6 Bf5 48. Qd4 h4 49. Bd3 Bxd3 50. >Qxd3 hxg3 51. Nxd5 Qe5 52. fxg3 Qb2+ 53. Kf3 Qc1 54. b6 Qc6 55. Qe4 Qb5 56. >b7 Qf1+ 57. Ke3 Qc1+ 58. Kf2 Qb2+ 59. Kf3 Qb3+ 60. Ne3 Qb2 61. Qe7 Kg7 62. >Qc7 Qb5 63. b8=Q Qh5+ 64. Kf2 Qh2+ 65. Ng2 Qh5 66. Qb2+ Qe5 67. Qbxe5+ Kg8 >68. Qc8+ Kh7 69. Qeh8# > >[Event "ICS Rated standard match"] >[Site "freechess.org"] >[Date "2001.06.23"] >[Round "-"] >[White "diep"] >[Black "FriarTuck"] >[Result "*"] >[WhiteElo "2341"] >[BlackElo "2314"] >[TimeControl "1800"] > >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. >dxe5 Be6 9. c3 Bc5 10. Nbd2 O-O 11. Bc2 Nxf2 12. Rxf2 f6 13. exf6 Bxf2+ 14. >Kxf2 Qxf6 15. Nf1 Ne5 16. Be3 Rae8 17. Bc5 Nxf3 18. gxf3 Rf7 19. Ng3 Bg4 >20. Kg1 Qxf3 21. Qxf3 Rxf3 22. a4 Bh3 23. Bd4 c6 24. Bf2 g6 25. axb5 axb5 >26. Ra6 Ref8 27. Nh1 h5 28. Bxg6 h4 29. Ra7 c5 30. Bh7+ Kh8 31. Bg6 R3f4 >32. Bd3 c4 33. Bb1 b4 34. Bc2 d4 35. cxd4 b3 36. Bb1 Rg4+ 37. Ng3 hxg3 38. >hxg3 Rg7 39. Ra5 Rgf7 40. Rh5+ Kg7 41. Rg5+ Kf6 42. Re5 Re7 43. Rh5 Bg4 44. >Rh6+ Kg5 45. Rg6+ Kh5 46. Rc6 Re2 47. Rc5+ Kh6 48. Rc6+ Kg5 49. Rc5+ Kf6 >50. Rb5 Bd7 51. Rd5 Rxf2 52. Kxf2 Ke6+ 53. Ke3 Kxd5 54. Be4+ Kd6 55. Kd2 >Be6 56. Kc3 Rg8 57. Kb4 Rxg3 58. Ka3 c3 59. bxc3 Rxc3 60. Kb2 Rh3 61. Ka3 >b2+ 62. Kxb2 Re3 63. Bg6 Kd5 64. Kc2 Kxd4 65. Kd2 Bb3 66. Bf5 Rf3 67. Bc8 >Rf2+ 68. Ke1 Ke3 69. Bb7 Bc2 70. Ba6 Be4 71. Bb5 Ra2 72. Be2 Rxe2+ 73. Kf1 >Rg2 74. Ke1 Rg1# > >Note that 'Deep Blue' (cough cough, gargle gargle) was running on hardware 400 >times slower than the real one. > >WHAT was it that you were claiming, Vincent? > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.