Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:25:08 06/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2001 at 12:56:26, Artem Pyatakov wrote: >I have decided to keep track of attack tables in my program, because I think >they will save computation time in the eval. > >My question now is this, given the experience of most people in this group, what >is the most useful info to keep in the attack table? > >Should I just keep the number of times that white is attacking the square and >black is attacking the square? Or is it very useful to keep track of what actual >pieces (and on what position on board) are attacking the square on both sides? > >Or is it some other kind of attack info? > >Thanks for all of your responses. If you are going to do this, the "counts" are pretty useless. You need to know which pieces are attacking a square. IE if I have two pawns attacking the square and you have a rook and queen attacking the square _I_ control it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.