Author: Albert Silver
Date: 11:05:26 06/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2001 at 15:24:53, Chris Carson wrote:
>On June 24, 2001 at 15:02:54, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On June 24, 2001 at 14:53:04, Chris Carson wrote:
>>
>>>On June 24, 2001 at 14:27:12, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ok, but the computers are very good against chess players up to 2500 Elo, so
>>>>this may give the impression they play about 2600 as an average.
>>>>Against stronger opponents (2650 and above) they would score less.
>>>
>>>Deep Junior scored 2702 against opponents with average rating of 2702 at
>>>Dortmund 200. So they can score more. :)
>>
>>I find it funny people will give opinions, and that is fine, but I sometimes
>>wonder what the opinion is based on... can't be the computer's game record. :)
>>
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Chris Carson
>
>Mark,
>
>You will find this very funny. Here are the results for all programs and all
>games 40/2 against average opponents 2648 and above. :)
>
>Prog Avg Opp Avg Total Lowest Opp Highest Opp
>ELO FIDE ELO Games Fide FIDE
>2632 2645 30 2566 2795
>2653 2671 22 2600 2795
>2650 2730 10 2650 2795
>
>Plus the DJ Dortmund 2000 performance 2702 vs 2702 FIDE over 9 games.
Disregarding Dortmund (super performance) and the Dutch championship, my problem
with the above is that these total games are done over quite some period of
time, a game or two at a time, and on variable hardware and conditions. To
quaklify for a Fide rating, one cannot just accumulate 9 games with one here,
two there, another here, etc. It has to be done with groups of at least 4 games
from a single event.
Albert
>
>The performance goes up, not down due to improvemets in SW and HW over the last
>3 years. Pretty stiff competition. :)
>
>Best Regards,
>Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.