Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:02:45 06/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2001 at 17:47:16, Chessfun wrote: >On June 25, 2001 at 15:28:04, Mark Young wrote: > >snip > >>Playing computer vs computer is not totally without merit, I would assume Fritz >>would do better against humans the say comet (only for example). As Fritz is >>results suggest it plays well over 100 points better in computer vs computer >>games. > >According to your 100 point theory by the latest SSDF list most of the programs >he listed would be excluded. > > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2653 29 -28 647 64% 2551 > 2 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2650 43 -40 302 67% 2528 > 3 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2632 43 -40 308 67% 2508 > 4 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -23 968 64% 2520 > 6 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2596 20 -20 1230 62% 2509 > 7 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2576 26 -26 733 61% 2499 > 8 204 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2565 23 -23 944 59% 2504 What is your point....all but one will be excluded in the qualifier. I would bet money Deep Fritz would do better against humans then say Genius 5, chess system tal, The chessmachine, elite 2265, Kasparov express, Radio shack 2100. chess challenger 7...ect. Point is computer vs computer games do have some merit. Unless you think all the above will play better against humans then Fritz. > > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.