Author: Albert Silver
Date: 15:39:15 06/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2001 at 17:49:27, Chessfun wrote:
>On June 25, 2001 at 17:17:13, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On June 25, 2001 at 15:08:12, Slater Wold wrote:
>>
>>>>>Chess Tiger 14.0
>>>>>Deep Fritz
>>>>>Gambit Tiger 2.0
>>>>>Hiarcs 7.32
>>>>>Junior 6.0
>>>>>Nimzo 8
>>>>>Shredder 5
>>>>>Crafty 18.10
>>
>>>Because the plan is to play 10 GM's, and see how that PARTICULAR engine does
>>>against a POOL of GM's. And to get an estimate of it's playing, against these
>>>particular GM's.
>>>
>>>Like I said in other posts, I have these engines, and I needed to pick _ONE_ to
>>>play these games. Right off the top of my head, I couldn't think of another
>>>way.
>>
>>I gave every engine a number between 1 and 8. So pick a number between 1 and 8,
>>and I'll tell you which engine that number corresponds to. I showed my wife the
>>list of numbers, so she can attest that the list is fair, and that I'm not going
>>to pick an engine because I want to see it win.
>>
>>If you don't trust me you can have someone else assign the numbers. This has to
>>be more efficient than using a computer for days on end in order to create a
>>number between 1 and 8.
>>
>>Maybe the computer result would be meaningful if you were going to have the
>>program play against another computer, but a human? It doesn't mean anything.
>>You may actually end up picking the worst one.
>>
>>bruce
>
>In case he wishes to be totally out of the selection process, I'll pick number
>Seven (7) for him.
Don't listen to her, 5 (five) is clearly better. If not, I propose a qualifier
match between 5 (five) and Seven (7) to see which is best.
Albert
>
>Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.