Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:01:57 06/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2001 at 21:54:07, Mike S. wrote: >On June 25, 2001 at 18:15:41, Mark Young wrote: > >>The results are bogus anyway, I can sit at home and win games as he did....Let >>me run the computer against Eduard....I bet the results would be much different. >> >>Why does he not play a 20 game match, the computer will learn what he is doing >>and pick a different way of playing against 2.Na3 Then he is toast. > >What matters then, is the single game (each) with a brilliant win against the >program, and not, if the learning feature may avoid repetition (or if some games >may be lost beforehand). That's not the point, but that these games can happen >at least once on each computer. I would be glad if I were capable of winning >such games regularly (I have some, but very few old one's). > >Furthermore, why call the results bogus, unless you have evidence that these >games aren't reproduceable or possible? That's not quite fair IMO. The point is we are talking about games under tournament conditions, not games sitting at home at blitz times, with no controls. Anyone can sit, play with the program, and produce games like this, but its not the same when you don't have control of the screen, program, and the settings of the program. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.