Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 04:12:12 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 06:57:19, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >Ok, Martin. >But in this case you are claiming that computers are much stronger than humans >if not appropriate anti-strategies were used. No, I don't claim that. Computers are tactical monsters. That's IMO already a anti-strategy. But I think it's not important to compare computers strength and humans strength in tournaments. Because that's not the reason to develop or to buy a program. For me it's important that a program can help me with analysing the games. I often analysed my games with Fritz. It didn't help me much. One time I gave one of my games to GM Schlosser. He took a short look (maybe 5 minutes) over my game and his comments helped me much more than analysing a game with Fritz for hours. That's what really matters IMO. >Let's say that you are not aware that you are playing against a computer, you >will regard your opponent as a strong grandmaster : that's what they call to >pass the Turing test, and I think it is quite an achievement.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.