Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP.

Author: Martin Schubert

Date: 04:21:30 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread

On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote:

>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b
>
>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position
>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening
>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo).

He was tryingto play closed. But he didn't do it well. Eduard suggested Ne1
instead of Bf4 and than f3 or f4. IMO even better is having the knight on e2
instead of f3, the position is more variable.

• Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP. Chessfun 04:27:19 06/26/01
• Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP. Mark Young 04:26:10 06/26/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.