Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP.

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 05:26:00 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread

On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote:

>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b
>
>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position
>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening
>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo).

Hi!

10.Ne1 was stronger and correct anto computer tactic, Bf4 was an bad move
against computer!

[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1P3/3P2PP/PP2NPB1/R2QNRK1 b k -

What play Tiger now? I Thinkt here after 10.Ne1 "now" have Human better Chance!

Eduard

• Re: With correctly diagram ! :) Eduard Nemeth 05:32:07 06/26/01
  • Re: This is NOW with correctly diagram - sorry! Eduard Nemeth 05:41:18 06/26/01
• Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP. Mark Young 05:31:46 06/26/01
  • Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP. Chessfun 05:50:57 06/26/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.