Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Controversy

Author: Mark Ryan

Date: 05:29:41 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 25, 2001 at 18:48:46, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On June 25, 2001 at 18:39:15, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>Don't listen to her, 5 (five) is clearly better. If not, I propose a qualifier
>>match between 5 (five) and Seven (7) to see which is best.
>>
>>                                     Albert
>
>That is clearly unfair to 4, which beat 5 (five) yesterday in my basement
>championships. It deserves a break too IMHO. Otherwise it's BGN all over again.
>
>Mogens.

Shouldn't we be using binary numbers?

Mark




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.