Author: Mark Young
Date: 05:31:46 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 08:26:00, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: > >>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b >> >>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). > >Hi! > >10.Ne1 was stronger and correct anto computer tactic, Bf4 was an bad move >against computer! > >[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1P3/3P2PP/PP2NPB1/R2QNRK1 b k - > >What play Tiger now? I Thinkt here after 10.Ne1 "now" have Human better Chance! > >Eduard It is easy to come up with moves with the computer sitting in front of you and you can look at the analysis on how it will respond....no trick there. It is much harder to do this over the board under tournament conditions. Are you saying if the IM play 10 Ne1 he would have won....I don't think so, as there would no doubt be other mistakes you would have to come up with better moves for.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.