Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP.

Author: Mark Young

Date: 05:37:23 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2001 at 08:31:25, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b
>>
>>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position
>>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening
>>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo).
>
>
>Not sure what you mean.  This position is _not_ closed.

I said the IM was playing to keep the position closed, the IM was trying to
provok the program into a locked center...IMO. But the program did not commit
positional suicide.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.