Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:45:11 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 08:12:01, Chris Carson wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: > >>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b >> >>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). > >Tactics (anti-computer) that work against programs at "blitz" time controls do >not work against computers at longer time controls. That's nonsense. The same was said 5 or 6 years ago against Pentium 100's. Yet these blitz games you are now looking at are the equal of tournament controls on P100's. >Trojan horse, stonewall, dutch, indian, KIA, KID, ... may be a good strategy >(anti-computer), but at 40/2 programs are much stronger than 2100, the results >show it, I have tried it with very limited success and the programs adapt >quickly to the strategy. Tell me please of the program that adapted to the strategy and how?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.