Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:50:57 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 08:31:46, Mark Young wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 08:26:00, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b >>> >>>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >>>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >>>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). >> >>Hi! >> >>10.Ne1 was stronger and correct anto computer tactic, Bf4 was an bad move >>against computer! >> >>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1P3/3P2PP/PP2NPB1/R2QNRK1 b k - >> >>What play Tiger now? I Thinkt here after 10.Ne1 "now" have Human better Chance! >> >>Eduard > >It is easy to come up with moves with the computer sitting in front of you and >you can look at the analysis on how it will respond....no trick there. I don't believe that was done. It's simple enough to see Ne1 or Nh2 are blocking, delaying moves without the aid of a PC. >Are you saying if the IM play 10 Ne1 he would have won....I don't think so, as >there would no doubt be other mistakes you would have to come up with better >moves for. No he is simply saying Ne1 is better than Bf4 against a PC program, which simply put, it is. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.