Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Matsuura played Anti-Computer Tactics, but ChessTiger busted it UP.

Author: Chessfun

Date: 06:05:15 06/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2001 at 08:53:13, Chris Carson wrote:

>Wow, this is some "2100" player.  I wish I could do this.  I do not see why the
>players do not just play the trojan horse, stonewall, KIA, KID, french, dutch,
>2.Na3, or better yet, just set up some closed lost position that any "2100"
>player could handle and trounce the program.  Since the programs are only "2100"
>positionally/strategically and not "2400", it should be a piece of cake on a
>866Mhz PIII.  This must all be a "hoax", these players must be "paid" by the
>evil chess empire "Chessbase".  This can't be real, close your eyes, cover your
>ears, and for crying out loud, the "Emperior" has wonderful clothes on.
>
>Quick e-mail everyone the memo:  Programs are only "2100"
>positionaly/strategically/in closed positions.  The word has not gotten out yet.
>Why hasn't CNN put the word out, it must be a "Chessbase" plot driven by greedy
>corporations.

Where are you coming up with this 2100?
Is it from a post of Bob's where he wrote in certain positions they
are 2100?. Please point me to whatever the post was.

Sarah.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.