Author: Chris Carson
Date: 06:11:58 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
1. I will not list people, however, if you read the attacks on my posts you will see who they are. 2. I did not say "GM" anywhere in my post. "2100" is what critics have claimed, so "2100" is what I said. I have stated that I believe (and results show this) that "2400" in closed positions is what the results show. 2600+ for all results, 2900 for open positions. I seen nothing that points to "2100" for program performance in closed position. I see a single game losses, but not "2100" performance. 3. You can view my opinion as nonsense. I can live with that, but you will note that I do not follow your postings with follow-ups that say "nonsense". I do state my reasons with data if I have it, or I qualify as just my opinion. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.