Author: martin fierz
Date: 06:35:35 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: >[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b > >It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). refuted? what on earth do you mean by that? in chess lingo, to refute something would mean to show that the other guy has made a mistake. the position after f5 is by no means bad for white and i have no clue as to why f5 should deserve an exclamation mark. do you? BTW, what is your chess rating? cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.