Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 06:39:53 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 09:35:35, martin fierz wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: > >>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b >> >>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). > >refuted? what on earth do you mean by that? in chess lingo, to refute something >would mean to show that the other guy has made a mistake. the position after f5 >is by no means bad for white and i have no clue as to why f5 should deserve an >exclamation mark. do you? BTW, what is your chess rating? > >cheers > martin I think the important question is not if a move is "in a objective sense" a mistake or not. You've got to look for positions which computers don't like instead of making the best move. I think computers play the same way. They try to open the position. I doubt that this is always good. But it is good against humans. Cheers, another Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.