Author: Mark Young
Date: 06:47:19 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 09:35:35, martin fierz wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 07:17:56, Mark Young wrote: > >>[D]1rb1k1nr/2q1bppp/p1npp3/2p5/1pP1PB2/3P1NPP/PP2NPB1/R2Q1RK1 b >> >>It is clear looking at the game, IM Matsuura was playing to keep the position >>closed against ChessTiger, but ChessTiger refuted this with 17...f5!. Opening >>the position and beating IM Matsuura(2467 Elo). > >refuted? what on earth do you mean by that? in chess lingo, to refute something >would mean to show that the other guy has made a mistake. the position after f5 >is by no means bad for white and i have no clue as to why f5 should deserve an >exclamation mark. do you? BTW, what is your chess rating? We are not talking about the pure board position, but how the IM tried to apply some anti-computer tactics, and how ChessTiger countered this and opened the position up were the programs play their best. When you talk about anti-computer tactics, you must have a frame of reference in that area to follow the statements. > >cheers > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.