Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:00:26 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 11:06:35, Dan Andersson wrote: that's why bitboards get still used by people at 32 bits processors. They never took effort to measure how fast/slow it is. >In most cases I get all the information I need from one or a few indirect memory >lookups, that's not too slow IMO. In my case, the Attackboard is used in >conjunction with an efficient conventional representation. I do feel that it's >correct to incrementally update variables that are used to either improve move >ordering or create cutoffs. As for speed of implementation I cannot really >compare figures, since I reuse a lot of data i.e. the behaviour will be >asymptotic (and very fast) and not representative of its behaviour on a >completely new position. But on closely similar positions (for example a >sequence of positions in a line searched) it has a good performance. > >Regards Dan Andersson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.