Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:03:52 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 08:53:13, Chris Carson wrote: >Wow, this is some "2100" player. I wish I could do this. I do not see why the >players do not just play the trojan horse, stonewall, KIA, KID, french, dutch, >2.Na3, or better yet, just set up some closed lost position that any "2100" >player could handle and trounce the program. Since the programs are only "2100" >positionally/strategically and not "2400", it should be a piece of cake on a >866Mhz PIII. This must all be a "hoax", these players must be "paid" by the >evil chess empire "Chessbase". This can't be real, close your eyes, cover your >ears, and for crying out loud, the "Emperior" has wonderful clothes on. > >Quick e-mail everyone the memo: Programs are only "2100" >positionaly/strategically/in closed positions. The word has not gotten out yet. >Why hasn't CNN put the word out, it must be a "Chessbase" plot driven by greedy >corporations. > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson I don't have a single clue what you are rambling about here. I simply pointed out that this is _not_ a "blocked position" by any definition that I use. Maybe we are at different "levels" in chess skill. But "blocked" does _not_ mean that two white and two black pawns are rammed together. It means _much_ more than that. This game was not "it". it is hard to discuss something when the vocabulary/definitions are not uniform.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.